reuters pictures
However, she warned that Apple needs to prove the authority of those patents if it is to win an admonition preventing the auction of Samsung's Galaxy Tab.
The accommodation is the latest in a altercation which spans 20 cases in 10 countries, some of which accept led to Samsung articles getting taken off the shelves.
In a abstracted case in the Netherlands, a cloister alone a agnate bid by Samsung to ban Apple products.
Samsung had argued Apple should not be accustomed to advertise accessories that use 3G adaptable technology patented by Samsung because it did not accept licenses to use the technology.
'Groundless'
Apple claims that the Galaxy ambit "slavishly" copies its massively-selling iPad and iPhone.
The Californian aggregation has approved to ban the auction of the Galaxy S 4G acute buzz and Galaxy Tab 10.1 book in the US.
A agnate cardinal in an Australian cloister led to a acting sales ban on the book in that country.
US adaptable networks accept against Apple's request, adage it could affect sales of the articles in the run up to Christmas.
California District Judge Lucy Koh disqualified that while patents accept been infringed, Apple have to now appearance that its affirmation on those inventions is valid.
The acknowledged patents cover three accoutrement architecture - including the exoteric attending of the accessory - and a 'list scrolling patent' which relates to how users appearance documents.
Samsung argued that Apple's claims are invalid due to ahead registered patents apropos to architecture elements and functionality.
The company's attorney, Kathleen Sullivan, said her applicant "clearly aloft abundant questions" and that the admonition bid should accordingly be rejected.
But Apple altercate that its own product's architecture is far above to those which came afore the iPad and iPhone, and so accordingly its patents should not be invalidated.
At one point in the audition the adjudicator captivated both Samsung and Apple articles up on the air and challenged the defence to whether they could analyze which accessory was which.
Samsung advocate Ms Sullivan, who was almost 10 anxiety away, responded: "Not at this ambit your honour."
Another advocate for Samsung accurately acclaimed the two.
A agent for the South Korean aggregation declared Apple's claims as "groundless".
Apple backer Kristen Huget said: "It's no accompaniment that Samsung's latest articles attending a lot like the iPhone and iPad.
"This affectionate of arrant artful is wrong, and we charge to assure Apple's bookish acreage if companies abduct our ideas."
Both companies accept been bound in apparent disputes back April, with anniversary accusing the added of anarchic assorted patents.
In The Hague, a Dutch cloister banned a Samsung bid to block Apple articles on the base that the US aggregation did not accept the appropriate to 3G licenses.
The cardinal said that 3G technology has been accustomed as an industry standard, and accordingly Samsung was answerable to action Apple licenses according to "fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory" - or Frand - terms.
source : BBC.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment